strategy for block and char devices are rightfully spec_strategy.

I feel like yanking all the "ISODEVMAP" stuff altogether, it looks
like a bad kludge...
This commit is contained in:
Poul-Henning Kamp 1995-02-13 06:12:32 +00:00
parent d86d477fe6
commit 4a565df5ed
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-20 02:59:44 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=6339
2 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* @(#)cd9660_vnops.c 8.3 (Berkeley) 1/23/94
* $Id: cd9660_vnops.c,v 1.10 1994/09/28 16:44:59 dfr Exp $
* $Id: cd9660_vnops.c,v 1.11 1995/01/16 17:03:28 joerg Exp $
*/
#include <sys/param.h>
@ -993,8 +993,7 @@ struct vnodeopv_entry_desc cd9660_specop_entries[] = {
{ &vop_lock_desc, cd9660_lock }, /* lock */
{ &vop_unlock_desc, cd9660_unlock }, /* unlock */
{ &vop_bmap_desc, spec_bmap }, /* bmap */
/* XXX strategy: panics, should be notsupp instead? */
{ &vop_strategy_desc, cd9660_strategy },/* strategy */
{ &vop_strategy_desc, spec_strategy }, /* strategy */
{ &vop_print_desc, cd9660_print }, /* print */
{ &vop_islocked_desc, cd9660_islocked },/* islocked */
{ &vop_pathconf_desc, spec_pathconf }, /* pathconf */

View File

@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* @(#)cd9660_vnops.c 8.3 (Berkeley) 1/23/94
* $Id: cd9660_vnops.c,v 1.10 1994/09/28 16:44:59 dfr Exp $
* $Id: cd9660_vnops.c,v 1.11 1995/01/16 17:03:28 joerg Exp $
*/
#include <sys/param.h>
@ -993,8 +993,7 @@ struct vnodeopv_entry_desc cd9660_specop_entries[] = {
{ &vop_lock_desc, cd9660_lock }, /* lock */
{ &vop_unlock_desc, cd9660_unlock }, /* unlock */
{ &vop_bmap_desc, spec_bmap }, /* bmap */
/* XXX strategy: panics, should be notsupp instead? */
{ &vop_strategy_desc, cd9660_strategy },/* strategy */
{ &vop_strategy_desc, spec_strategy }, /* strategy */
{ &vop_print_desc, cd9660_print }, /* print */
{ &vop_islocked_desc, cd9660_islocked },/* islocked */
{ &vop_pathconf_desc, spec_pathconf }, /* pathconf */