From 51dc4fea4c00b3632e1887dd6dceae8ab5edc8fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Kandaurov Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:08:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove reference to the rlist code from comments, and fix a typo visible in the resulted change. Reviewed by: kib MFC after: 1 week --- sys/kern/subr_blist.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/kern/subr_blist.c b/sys/kern/subr_blist.c index 788b5eb035d0..5c45b8197ee4 100644 --- a/sys/kern/subr_blist.c +++ b/sys/kern/subr_blist.c @@ -52,14 +52,10 @@ * radix tree should be able to operate well no matter how much * fragmentation there is and no matter how large a bitmap is used. * - * Unlike the rlist code, the blist code wires all necessary memory at - * creation time. Neither allocations nor frees require interaction with - * the memory subsystem. In contrast, the rlist code may allocate memory - * on an rlist_free() call. The non-blocking features of the blist code - * are used to great advantage in the swap code (vm/nswap_pager.c). The - * rlist code uses a little less overall memory than the blist code (but - * due to swap interleaving not all that much less), but the blist code - * scales much, much better. + * The blist code wires all necessary memory at creation time. Neither + * allocations nor frees require interaction with the memory subsystem. + * The non-blocking features of the blist code are used in the swap code + * (vm/swap_pager.c). * * LAYOUT: The radix tree is layed out recursively using a * linear array. Each meta node is immediately followed (layed out