pf: support if-bound with reply-to

On reply-to we don't know what interface to bind to when we create
the state. Create any reply-to state as floating, but bind to the
appropriate interface once we're handling the reply.

See also:	https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15220
Sponsored by:	Rubicon Communications, LLC ("Netgate")
This commit is contained in:
Kristof Provost 2024-02-02 21:56:55 +01:00
parent 51c6bf0478
commit 6460322a0a
2 changed files with 88 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -423,6 +423,13 @@ BOUND_IFACE(struct pf_kstate *st, struct pfi_kkif *k)
if (! (st->rule.ptr->rule_flag & PFRULE_IFBOUND))
return (V_pfi_all);
/*
* Initially set to all, because we don't know what interface we'll be
* sending this out when we create the state.
*/
if (st->rule.ptr->rt == PF_REPLYTO)
return (V_pfi_all);
/* Don't overrule the interface for states created on incoming packets. */
if (st->direction == PF_IN)
return (k);
@ -7317,15 +7324,27 @@ pf_route(struct mbuf **m, struct pf_krule *r, struct ifnet *oifp,
dst.sin_addr.s_addr = naddr.v4.s_addr;
ifp = nkif ? nkif->pfik_ifp : NULL;
} else {
struct pfi_kkif *kif;
if (!PF_AZERO(&s->rt_addr, AF_INET))
dst.sin_addr.s_addr =
s->rt_addr.v4.s_addr;
ifp = s->rt_kif ? s->rt_kif->pfik_ifp : NULL;
kif = s->rt_kif;
/* If pfsync'd */
if (ifp == NULL && r->rpool.cur != NULL) {
ifp = r->rpool.cur->kif ?
r->rpool.cur->kif->pfik_ifp : NULL;
kif = r->rpool.cur->kif;
}
if (ifp != NULL && kif != NULL &&
r->rule_flag & PFRULE_IFBOUND &&
r->rt == PF_REPLYTO &&
s->kif == V_pfi_all) {
s->kif = kif;
s->orig_kif = oifp->if_pf_kif;
}
PF_STATE_UNLOCK(s);
}
@ -7538,14 +7557,26 @@ pf_route6(struct mbuf **m, struct pf_krule *r, struct ifnet *oifp,
&naddr, AF_INET6);
ifp = nkif ? nkif->pfik_ifp : NULL;
} else {
struct pfi_kkif *kif;
if (!PF_AZERO(&s->rt_addr, AF_INET6))
PF_ACPY((struct pf_addr *)&dst.sin6_addr,
&s->rt_addr, AF_INET6);
ifp = s->rt_kif ? s->rt_kif->pfik_ifp : NULL;
kif = s->rt_kif;
/* If pfsync'd */
if (ifp == NULL && r->rpool.cur != NULL)
if (ifp == NULL && r->rpool.cur != NULL) {
ifp = r->rpool.cur->kif ?
r->rpool.cur->kif->pfik_ifp : NULL;
kif = r->rpool.cur->kif;
}
if (ifp != NULL && kif != NULL &&
r->rule_flag & PFRULE_IFBOUND &&
r->rt == PF_REPLYTO &&
s->kif == V_pfi_all) {
s->kif = kif;
s->orig_kif = oifp->if_pf_kif;
}
}
if (s)

View File

@ -407,6 +407,61 @@ ifbound_cleanup()
pft_cleanup
}
atf_test_case "ifbound_reply_to" "cleanup"
ifbound_reply_to_head()
{
atf_set descr 'Test that reply-to states bind to the expected interface'
atf_set require.user root
}
ifbound_reply_to_body()
{
pft_init
j="route_to:ifbound_reply_to"
epair_one=$(vnet_mkepair)
epair_two=$(vnet_mkepair)
ifconfig ${epair_one}b inet 192.0.2.2/24 up
ifconfig ${epair_two}b up
vnet_mkjail $j ${epair_one}a ${epair_two}a
jexec $j ifconfig ${epair_one}a 192.0.2.1/24 up
jexec $j ifconfig ${epair_two}a 198.51.100.1/24 up
jexec $j route add default 198.51.100.254
jexec $j pfctl -e
pft_set_rules $j \
"set state-policy if-bound" \
"block" \
"pass in on ${epair_one}a reply-to (${epair_one}a 192.0.2.2) inet from any to 192.0.2.0/24 keep state"
atf_check -s exit:0 -o ignore \
ping -c 3 192.0.2.1
atf_check -s exit:0 \
${common_dir}/pft_ping.py \
--to 192.0.2.1 \
--from 203.0.113.2 \
--sendif ${epair_one}b \
--replyif ${epair_one}b
# pft_ping uses the same ID every time, so this will look like more traffic in the same state
atf_check -s exit:0 \
${common_dir}/pft_ping.py \
--to 192.0.2.1 \
--from 203.0.113.2 \
--sendif ${epair_one}b \
--replyif ${epair_one}b
jexec $j pfctl -ss -vv
}
ifbound_reply_to_cleanup()
{
pft_cleanup
}
atf_test_case "dummynet_frag" "cleanup"
dummynet_frag_head()
{
@ -465,5 +520,6 @@ atf_init_test_cases()
atf_add_test_case "icmp_nat"
atf_add_test_case "dummynet"
atf_add_test_case "ifbound"
atf_add_test_case "ifbound_reply_to"
atf_add_test_case "dummynet_frag"
}