Add a bit of sanity checking and problem avoidance in case the

timecounter hardware is bogus.

This will produce a new warning "microuptime() went backwards"
and try to not screw up the process resource accounting.
This commit is contained in:
Poul-Henning Kamp 1999-11-29 11:29:04 +00:00
parent ab1c0de5ed
commit 8f04f6c729
2 changed files with 17 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
#include <sys/resourcevar.h>
#include <sys/malloc.h>
#include <sys/proc.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <vm/vm.h>
#include <vm/vm_param.h>
@ -519,8 +520,13 @@ calcru(p, up, sp, ip)
* quantum, which is much greater than the sampling error.
*/
microuptime(&tv);
tu += (tv.tv_usec - switchtime.tv_usec) +
(tv.tv_sec - switchtime.tv_sec) * (int64_t)1000000;
if (timevalcmp(&tv, &switchtime, <))
printf("microuptime() went backwards (%ld.%06ld -> %ld,%06ld)\n",
switchtime.tv_sec, switchtime.tv_usec,
tv.tv_sec, tv.tv_usec);
else
tu += (tv.tv_usec - switchtime.tv_usec) +
(tv.tv_sec - switchtime.tv_sec) * (int64_t)1000000;
}
ptu = p->p_stats->p_uu + p->p_stats->p_su + p->p_stats->p_iu;
if (tu < ptu || (int64_t)tu < 0) {

View File

@ -791,8 +791,15 @@ mi_switch()
* process was running, and add that to its total so far.
*/
microuptime(&new_switchtime);
p->p_runtime += (new_switchtime.tv_usec - switchtime.tv_usec) +
(new_switchtime.tv_sec - switchtime.tv_sec) * (int64_t)1000000;
if (timevalcmp(&new_switchtime, &switchtime, <)) {
printf("microuptime() went backwards (%ld.%06ld -> %ld,%06ld)\n",
switchtime.tv_sec, switchtime.tv_usec,
new_switchtime.tv_sec, new_switchtime.tv_usec);
new_switchtime = switchtime;
} else {
p->p_runtime += (new_switchtime.tv_usec - switchtime.tv_usec) +
(new_switchtime.tv_sec - switchtime.tv_sec) * (int64_t)1000000;
}
/*
* Check if the process exceeds its cpu resource allocation.