Poul-Henning Kamp 316f7f7725 Never again shall we link libgcc dynamic. It was a big mistake in the ... first place and we were too long in finding out. Now we know, and the damage is hard to fix. This is part one: ld will not link gcc dynamic, if specified as "-lgcc". Suggested by: dyson & davidg		1995-03-06 08:00:23 +00:00
..
i386	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
ldconfig
ldd
rtld	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
sparc	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
cplus-dem.c
etc.c
ld.1
ld.1aout
ld.c	Never again shall we link libgcc dynamic. It was a big mistake in the	1995-03-06 08:00:23 +00:00
ld.h	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
lib.c	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
Makefile
PORTING
rrs.c	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
shlib.c	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
symbol.c
symseg.h
TODO
warnings.c	Weak symbol support from NetBSD. This should bring us in sync with the	1995-03-04 17:49:20 +00:00
xbits.c