mirror of
https://git.hardenedbsd.org/hardenedbsd/HardenedBSD.git
synced 2024-11-25 01:55:19 +01:00
33c2c58f0a
We were previously unconditionally adding PROT_WRITE to the maxprot of
private mapping (because a private mapping can be written even if the
fd is read-only), but this might violate the user's PROT_MAX request.
While here, rename cap_maxprot to max_maxprot. This is the intersection
of the maximum protections imposed by capsicum rights on the fd (not
really relevant for private mappings) and the user-required maximum
protections (which were not being obeyed). In particular, cap_maxprot
is a misnomer after the introduction of PROT_MAX.
Add some regression test cases. mmap__maxprot_shm fails without this
patch.
Note: Capsicum's CAP_MMAP_W is a bit ambiguous. Should it be required
in order to create writeable private mappings? Currently it is, even
though such mappings don't permit writes to the object referenced by the
fd.
Reported by: brooks
Reviewed by: brooks
MFC after: 1 month
Fixes:
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
atf_python | ||
ci | ||
etc | ||
examples | ||
freebsd_test_suite | ||
include | ||
sys | ||
__init__.py | ||
conftest.py | ||
Kyuafile | ||
Makefile | ||
Makefile.depend | ||
Makefile.inc0 | ||
README |
src/tests: The FreeBSD test suite ================================= Usage of the FreeBSD test suite: (1) Run the tests: kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile (2) See the test results: kyua report For further information on using the test suite, read tests(7): man tests Description of FreeBSD test suite ================================= The build of the test suite is organized in the following manner: * The build of all test artifacts is protected by the MK_TESTS knob. The user can disable these with the WITHOUT_TESTS setting in src.conf(5). * The goal for /usr/tests/ (the installed test programs) is to follow the same hierarchy as /usr/src/ wherever possible, which in turn drives several of the design decisions described below. This simplifies the discoverability of tests. We want a mapping such as: /usr/src/bin/cp/ -> /usr/tests/bin/cp/ /usr/src/lib/libc/ -> /usr/tests/lib/libc/ /usr/src/usr.bin/cut/ -> /usr/tests/usr.bin/cut/ ... and many more ... * Test programs for specific utilities and libraries are located next to the source code of such programs. For example, the tests for the src/lib/libcrypt/ library live in src/lib/libcrypt/tests/. The tests/ subdirectory is optional and should, in general, be avoided. * The src/tests/ hierarchy (this directory) provides generic test infrastructure and glue code to join all test programs together into a single test suite definition. * The src/tests/ hierarchy also includes cross-functional test programs: i.e. test programs that cover more than a single utility or library and thus don't fit anywhere else in the tree. Consider this to follow the same rationale as src/share/man/: this directory contains generic manual pages while the manual pages that are specific to individual tools or libraries live next to the source code. In order to keep the src/tests/ hierarchy decoupled from the actual test programs being installed --which is a worthy goal because it simplifies the addition of new test programs and simplifies the maintenance of the tree-- the top-level Kyuafile does not know which subdirectories may exist upfront. Instead, such Kyuafile automatically detects, at run-time, which */Kyuafile files exist and uses those directly. Similarly, every directory in src/ that wants to install a Kyuafile to just recurse into other subdirectories reuses this Kyuafile with auto-discovery features. As an example, take a look at src/lib/tests/ whose sole purpose is to install a Kyuafile into /usr/tests/lib/. The goal in this specific case is for /usr/tests/lib/ to be generated entirely from src/lib/. --