hardenedbsd/CONTRIBUTING.md

Contribution Guidelines for GitHub

General Contributions to FreeBSD

Please read the guidelines in Contributing to FreeBSD for all the ways you can contribute to the project, how the project is organized, how to build different parts of the project, etc. The developer's handbook is another useful resource.

FreeBSD accepts source code contributions using one of several methods:

• A GitHub pull request
• A code review in Phabricator
• An attachment on a Bugzilla ticket
• Direct access to the Git repository

The preferred method depends on a few factors including the size or scope of the change. GitHub pull requests are preferred for relatively straightforward changes where the contributor already has a GitHub account.

GitHub Pull Requests

Presently, GitHub 'freebsd-src' repository is one of the publish-only services for the FreeBSD 'src' repository the project uses to promote collaboration and contribution. Pull requests that need little developer time, are generally small, and have limited scope should be submitted. Do not submit pull requests that are security-related, problem reports, works in progress, changes that are controversial and need discussion, or changes that require specialized review.

A pull request will be considered if:

• It is ready or nearly ready to be committed. A committer should be able to land the pull request with less than 10 minutes of additional work.
• It passes all the GitHub CI jobs.
• You can respond to feedback quickly.
• It touches fewer than about 10 files and the changes are less than about 200 lines. Changes larger than this may be OK, or you may be asked to submit multiple pull requests of a more manageable size.
• Each logical change is a separate commit within the pull request. Commit messages for each change should follow the commit log message guide.
• All commits have, as the author, your name and valid email address as you would like to see them in the FreeBSD repository. Fake github.com addresses cannot be used.
• The scope of the pull request should not change during review. If the review suggests changes that expand the scope, please create an independent pull request.
• Fixup commits should be squashed with the commit they are fixing. Each commit in your branch should be suitable for FreeBSD's repository.
• Commits should include one or more Signed-off-by: lines with full name and email address certifying Developer Certificate of Origin.
• The commits follow FreeBSD's style guide. See Style.
• Run tools/build/checkstyle9.pl on your Git branch and eliminate all errors.
• The commits do not introduce trailing white space.
• If the commit fixes a bug, please add 'PR: <bugnumber>' to the commit message.
• If there's a code review in Phabricator, please include a link as a 'Differential Revision: ' line.
• If you have run FreeBSD's sources through a static analysis tool, please don't submit the raw results. Please also see the chunking up guidelines. Also, please make sure that kyua tests are the same before / after your change. Ideally, you'd also create a test case that shows an actual bug that's being fixed by these changes.

When updating your pull request, please rebase with a forced push rather than a merge commit.

More complex changes may be submitted as pull requests, but they may be closed if they are too large, too unwieldy, become inactive, need further discussion in the community, or need extensive revision. Please avoid creating large, wide-ranging cleanup patches: they are too large and lack the focus needed for a good review. Misdirected patches may be redirected to a more appropriate forum for the patch to be resolved.

Please make sure that your submissions compile and work before submitting. If you need feedback, a pull request might not be the right place (it may just be summarily closed if there are too many obvious mistakes).

If you want to cleanup style or older coding conventions in preparation for some other commit, please go ahead and prepare those patches. However, please avoid just cleaning up to make it cleaner, unless there's a clear advantage to doing so. While the project strives to have a uniform coding style, our style offers a range of choices making some 'cleanups' ambiguous at best. Also, some files have their own consistent style that deviates from style(9). Style changes take volunteer time to process, but that time can be quite limited, so please be respectful.

The current theory for pull requests on GitHub is to facilitate inclusion in the project. The guidelines are streamlined for quick decisions about each pull request. Unless explicitly stated, rejection here as "not ready" or "too large" does not mean the project is uninterested in the work, it just means the submission does not meet the limited scope for pull requests accepted here. Sometimes it is easier to review a GitHub pull request than to do the review in Phabricator, so that's also allowed.

Finally, if we close a pull request because it's not ready yet, or stalled out, please don't give up. You can resubmit them later once you have time to finish the work, or to have them reconsidered if you think we've made an error in closing it.

Author Name and Email

We require that contributions are associated with a unique identity. The author email address should not be <something>@users.noreply.github.com. Do note that your name and email address will become a permanent and immutable part of the public Git history of the FreeBSD source tree.

Style

Avoid adding trailing newlines and whitespace. These slow down the integration process and are a distraction. git diff will highlight them in red, as will the Files Changed tab in the pull request.

For C programs, see style(9) for details. You can use Clang format with the top level .clang-format file if you are unsure. The git clang-format command can help minimize churn by only formatting the areas nearby the changes. While not perfect, using these tools will maximize your chances of not having style comments on your pull requests.

For Makefiles changes, see style.Makefile(5) for details. FreeBSD's base system uses the in-tree make, not GNU Make, so make(1) is another useful resource.

The project uses mdoc for all its man pages. Changes should pass mandoc -Tlint and igor (install the latter with pkg install igor). Please be sure to observe the one-sentence-per-line rule so manual pages properly render. Any semantic changes to the manual pages should bump the date. style.mdoc(5) has the all details.

For Lua, please see style.lua(9) for details. Lua is used for the boot loader and a few scripts in the base system.

For shell scripts, avoid using bash. The system shell (/bin/sh) is preferred. Shell scripts in the base system cannot use bash or bash extensions not present in FreeBSD's shell.

Signed-off-by

Other projects use Signed-off-by to create a paper trail for contributions they receive. The Developer Certificate of Origin is an attestation that the person making the contribution can do it under the current license of the file. Other projects that have 'delegated' hierarchies also use it when maintainers integrate these patches and submit them upstream.

Right now, pull requests on GitHub are an experimental feature. We strongly suggest that people add this line. It creates a paper trail for infrequent contributors. Also, developers that are landing a pull request will use a Signed-off-by line to set the author for the commit.

These lines are easy to add with git commit -s.

Submitting as part of class work

If you are a professor or teacher that wishes to have your students submit fixes as part of their class work, please contact imp@FreeBSD.org before the semester to ensure we allocate the proper resources to process them quickly. We'll give you more details when you contact us and thanks for including FreeBSD in your class work. It also helps us keep track.

FreeBSD's Upstreams

Anything that's in the directory contrib, crypto, sys/contrib or sys/cddl likely has an upstream we pull from. Please do a git log --merges in any subdirectory of these you are submitting patches for to find out the last time we merged from upstream. If it is in the last 5 years, upstream is "active" and you should submit your patches there and let the last few people to commit to this file (especially merge commits) know. If it's been more than 5 years, upstream is likely inactive so please submit the patch. We can sort out if it should go into FreeBSD or upstream.